Franketology: February 10, 2025

Good news: my illness is gone. Bad news: you’re gonna get some rambling before my bracket…

This week, let’s discuss the bubble. Man, it is WILD down there. Teams once thought relatively safe are falling onto the bubble, teams coming back from the dead—Arkansas?! …KANSAS STATE?!?!?!—and a whole bunch of resumes that look very similar. Let’s look at some blind profiles of the last 4 in and first 4 out:

Team 1 (Ark) - resume metrics avg 44.33; predictive metrics avg 49.67; 4 wins vs. at-large teams; 3-5 Q1A; 3-7 Q1; 4-9 Q1&2
Team 2 (BYU) - 55.67 / 32.33 / 1 / 0-4 / 2-5 / 5-8
Team 3 (UCI) - 46.33 / 84.33 / 0 / 0-0 / 1-1 / 4-2
Team 4 (UNC) - 48.33 / 40.33 / 1 / 1-7 / 1-9 / 6-9
Team 5 (SDSU) - 43.00 / 53.67 / 2 / 1-2 / 3-3 / 5-5
Team 6 (Vandy) - 38.00 / 47.67 / 3 / 1-3 / 2-5 / 6-6
Team7 (Wake) - 32.33 / 66.33 / 1 / 1-5 / 1-6 / 6-6
Team 8 (UCF) - 52.00 / 64.67 / 2 / 2-7 / 3-7 / 3-10

Not a ton of differentiation there. Picking the 4 best teams from that list is an entirely subjective exercise in what you value. Q1 Ws, well that’s obviously Team 8. Q1 win percentage? Teams 3 & 5 are your bag. Resume metrics? Teams 6 & 7 are your top choices. Predictive metrics? Well that’s teams 2 and 4. Q1&2 wins? Look at teams 4, 6, & 7. Wins against the field? Teams 1 & 6.

And this exercise underscores the insanity of bracketology. The term of a committee member lasts 5 years, and they rotate in and out in a fashion that there’s always some level of continuity. So we are trying to predict what a disparate group of 12 individuals, all of whom may value different things, are going to emphasize when they review these resumes. We can make our best guesses based on what past committees have done, but that’s never a great indicator. For my money, if I were a committee member, I’d emphasize quality wins. For me, it’s hard to separate that from what I think the committee will do, so my brackets tend to skew towards big wins. And so among these teams I took, in order, Team 1 (Arkansas), Team 6 (Vandy), and Team 5 (SDSU), leaving me one team short. After that, the best remaining resume metric was Team 7 at 32.33. And even though team 8 has more Q1 wins and wins against the field, Team 7 has a significantly better Q1&2 win%, as Team 8 is 0-3 in Q2. Therefore, I went with Team 7 (Wake Forest). The first four out are Team 2 (BYU), Team 8 (UCF), Team4 (UNC) and Team 3 (UCI). UCI is probably a pipe dream, as they will enter Selection Sunday with 0 wins against the at-large field, but the resume metrics (46.33) are close enough to say “maybe”.

So where does that leave us? Well…I dunno. Just that this process isn’t easy, and it isn’t rote. It is performed by human beings doing their best to balance a bunch of competing factors, and predicting how a group of humans will balance these factors year-to-year naturally involves some (educated) guessing. Keep that in mind as we enter the stretch run of this regular season.

With that out of the way, let’s get to the current Franketology bracket:

Direct link to spreadsheet here.

True Seed List

Bold = Auto Bid

  1. Auburn

  2. Alabama

  3. Duke

  4. Tennessee

  5. Florida

  6. Purdue

  7. Iowa St.

  8. Houston

  9. Arizona

  10. Texas Tech

  11. Texas A&M

  12. Wisconsin

  13. Michigan St.

  14. Kansas

  15. Michigan

  16. Kentucky

  17. Marquette

  18. Illinois

  19. Maryland

  20. St. John’s

  21. Oregon

  22. UCLA

  23. Missouri

  24. Ole Miss

  25. Mississippi St.

  26. Baylor

  27. Creighton

  28. Clemson

  29. Saint Mary’s

  30. Memphis

  31. UConn

  32. Louisville

  33. Gonzaga

  34. Ohio St.

  35. Nebraska

  36. West Virginia

  37. New Mexico

    LAST FOUR BYES

  38. Utah St.

  39. Texas

  40. Oklahoma

  41. Georgia

    LAST FOUR IN

  42. Arkansas

  43. Vanderbilt

  44. San Diego St.

  45. Wake Forest

  46. VCU

  47. UC San Diego

  48. Drake

  49. Arkansas St.

  50. McNeese St.

  51. Yale

  52. Grand Canyon

  53. Liberty

  54. Akron

  55. Samford

  56. High Point

  57. Lipscomb

  58. S. Dakota St.

  59. UNCW

  60. No. Colorado

  61. Bryant

  62. Norfolk St.

  63. Purdue Fort Wayne

  64. CCSU

  65. Southern U

  66. Quinnipiac

  67. Little Rock

  68. Bucknell

And fuck it, I’ve got nothing better to do, let’s get to NIT Bracketology!

NIT SEEDS

1 Seeds
BYU
UNC
SMU
Boise St.

2 Seeds
George Mason
USC
Xavier
San Francisco

3 Seeds
UC Irvine
North Texas
LSU
Bradley

4 Seeds
South Carolina
Jacksonville St.
Utah Valley
Chattanooga

5 Seeds
UCF
Pittsburgh
Indiana
Cincy

6 Seeds
Arizona St.
Kansas St.
Villanova
Northwestern

7 Seeds
Santa Clara
Iowa
Rutgers
TCU

8 Seeds
Dayton
Stanford
Colo. St.
Col. of Charleston

Previous
Previous

Franketology: February 14, 2025

Next
Next

Franketology: February 7, 2025